🔗 Share this article

The Evolution of a Phenomenon can be defined by specific steps.

1. The Core Concept

A charismatic leader or coaches present a revolutionary approach pledging a solution for disconnected individuals.

And so it goes. They’re getting ready to challenge the establishment in Australia. Tensions are rising. Signs of trouble appear from the sidelines. A lone figure, naked, nervous, the slogan POSITIVE INTENT written on his body as a statement, has emerged into view and is being led away with discretion towards an inconclusive loan stint in county cricket.

Remember the start, when the world was still young? The days of Bazball 1.0, of uninhibited aggression.

2. The Honeymoon Phase

Movement founders promise a fresh beginning, a brighter tomorrow, love, redemption within a community who all believe in the philosophy.

How did it feel initially? A team united basking in glory. Body art. Forearms. Focus. Peak performance vibes. Admittedly, England’s players often say Bazball doesn’t actually exist, which is funny since it’s not recognized, what was that spectacle?

However, everyone understands the concept. It’s the player playing a shot so outrageous it’s beyond belief. It’s the excitement of the leader in ultimate mode, a look that says: focused titan, beard made of wood, untamed style, so authentically Modern Savage you wouldn’t be surprised to notice and find him positioned at mid-off bare-chested embracing nature.

It’s the batsman continuing to have permission addressing the media, appearing as a happy little woodland creature in a waistcoat, uttering phrases such as we’re challenging norms. And yes, the energy, for quite a long time, was entirely positive.

3. The Growth Phase

Building period. Unity enforced through repetition of key phrases. These ideas can appear contradictory as a loyalty check.

Is it just me? The backlash, the outrage, the sense of betrayal after the first Ashes Test defeat appears excessive, overdone. The batting collapsed in Perth, as is typical there. They were torn apart in the field in a short span as the bowling and captaincy fell apart, carved around by the opponent playing aggressively but smarter, adjusting to the pitch, an athlete shining with brilliance.

And now we have this the criticism, the rage, the perception of the team as a failure. The opinion suggests that defeat must be total, they should be dismantled, to be cleansed, flame-throwered, destroyed by the vengeful purity of the bowler’s action, the simple basics of Scott Boland, marking his wickets modestly like he’s just been given a nice new fishing rod. What will this do to them?

4. External Conflict

Challenges surface from failures in the plan. Yet, mistakes are denied. It starts to feed on anger towards critics.

The fact remains, approaching the upcoming game, we have now reached an intriguing moment in the lifespan of this movement. England could quite easily win in the next Test in a blur of adrenal disruption. Probably, they could lose just as quickly. And if they do lose it feels like we really might be entering the decline.

Ahead of this, a couple of points to consider on the topic. More than two years ago, at the start, of optimism and energy, an piece was published calling it a phenomenon. People were very angry, which was helpful as it’s known the best way of proving something definitely isn’t a cult is should followers send hundreds of furiously one-eyed messages rejecting criticism of the philosophy.

The developments in the last few days is just as interesting. Criticism of the approach is now the trend. Social media is furious, critical analysts, shots of angry middle-aged supporters abroad disappointed by the short match, similar to investors demanding recourse.

Meanwhile, there is the broader context of Australia’s more nuanced more culturally hard-wired exasperation with the aggressive tourists, out there saying, your cherished traditions and have honed as part of your identity from others, well, it’s all a bit of a gag after all.

And this is the real point. It’s all cults. Bazball was a cult as the game has its own culture. Or rather, English cricket has always been a cult, a clique, a garden party, a closed world with two hundred years of opaque and ritualistic cult history defining it. Historically, this was a place where power and access are hoarded. It’s the colonial game of England, the original sports washers. And guess what, Britain is itself a cult, a series of esoteric hierarchies, a royal family remains.

The players have been sealed up in this environment since childhood. Attempting to break free, to create a less brutal environment, they are mirroring their upbringing, building another enclosure, a limited community, but doing it this time with a new team and a mentor who wants you to be yourself provided you conform.

Live where your feet are. Confront risks. Despite efforts, things stay similar.

Considering this, it might be appropriate to offer compassion for the approach, to appreciate its good points, that are numerous. What does it represent? Creating a sense of freedom. Challenging orthodoxies. Batting aggressively|Attacking with